Compare GhostGraph vs Ginco APIs providers

This page compares GhostGraph and Ginco across APIs provider data, including plan type, API type, chain, pricing, technology, available APIs, limitations, security features, monitoring, regions, and documentation links where available.

Compared providers: GhostGraph, Ginco.

46 providers and 76 plans to compare
46
Offer
Plan
Plan
Historical Data
API Type
API Type
Technology
Chain
Access Price
Access Price
Query Price
Trial
Trial
Available APIs
Limitations
Security Improvements
Monitoring & Analytics
Regions
Regions
Additional Features
Address
Tags
Uptime SLA
Verified Uptime
Blocks Behind SLA
Verified Blocks Behind Avg.
Bandwidth SLA
Verified Latency
Support SLA
Minimize Sidebar
GhostGraph
Enterprise
Archive
Indexed Data
Custom
mainnet
Custom
Custom pricing & SLAs
No
GraphQL, SQL
Unlimited deployed graphs
DDoS Protection, IP Protection
Indexer logs, Usage analitycs, GhostLogs trial
Global
Priority Telegram support, Community library, Proxy finder, Mirroring, Dune incremental uploads
Ginco
Enterprise
Pruned
RPC
EVM JSON-RPC
mainnet
Custom
Custom
Yes
eth_getBalance, eth_sendTransaction, eth_call
Custom
Data Protection, Access Control, Constant Monitoring
High Availability and Performance Metric, Operational Dashboard and Analytics, Transaction History and Tracking
Japan
Real-Time Notifications, Token & NFT Tracking, Integrated Web3 Cloud Platform, High Reliability and Low Latency
Contact
chain.love

chain.love

LinkedInXTelegramGitHub
DocumentationWhitepaper

©2024-2026 CHAIN.LOVE